US Justice Dept backs consumers in Las Vegas hotel pricing case
By Mike Scarcella
Oct 25 (Reuters) -The U.S. Justice Department on Thursday backed consumers who are fighting to revive a closely watched lawsuit accusing major hotels in Las Vegas of using shared data and computer algorithms to charge artificially inflated room rates.
Justice Department lawyers said in a friend-of-the-court brief to the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals that the use of algorithms by competitors to guide pricing decisions created “new dangers” for consumers.
The DOJ said a federal judge in Nevada who dismissed the consumers’ proposed class action made legal errors that should not be upheld.
The plaintiffs had accused a group of hotel owners along the famed Las Vegas strip of overcharging guests by feeding sensitive internal information to a shared software platform that offered pricing recommendations.
The price-fixing lawsuit filed last year against software maker Cendyn and the hotels, including Wynn Resorts and Caesars, was the first to reach a U.S. appeals court, and the case will be closely watched for its potential to influence other cases.
Cendyn, Wynn and Caesars either declined to comment or did not immediately respond to a request for comment. The Justice Department did not immediately respond to a similar request.
Plaintiffs’ attorney Steve Berman, a lawyer for the consumers, welcomed what he called the government's “powerful” submission to the San Francisco-based appeals court. The Justice Department is not part of the case but sometimes weighs in on cases where it believes there is broad public interest.
The hotels and software provider Cendyn have denied any wrongdoing.
In dismissing the lawsuit, Chief U.S. District Judge Miranda Du said in May that the consumers had not shown that the hotels were using Cendyn's software platform at the same and in coordination. Du also said the system generated pricing recommendations that hotels were not bound to follow.
The Justice Department's filing argued that a decision upholding the trial court ruling “could stymie meritorious antitrust claims involving pricing algorithms.”
Plaintiffs do not need to show “simultaneous action” to allege a price-fixing scheme, the brief said, and agreements among rivals to use algorithms to establish a default or starting price are illegal “even if there is no further agreement on final prices.”
Several pending lawsuits in other federal courts challenge corporate use of revenue management software.
In one case, a federal judge in New Jersey on Sept. 30 dismissed a consumer price-fixing lawsuit that was lodged against hotels in that state.
The case is Richard Gibson et al v. Cendyn Group et al, 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, No. 24-3576.
Read more:
Atlantic City hotels defeat latest class action over casino room rates
Consumers seek second chance in Las Vegas hotel price-fixing lawsuit
CoStar, hotels slam consumers' ‘fanciful’ room pricing lawsuit
Renters suing RealPage get US backing in pricing lawsuits
Reporting by Mike Scarcella
免责声明: XM Group仅提供在线交易平台的执行服务和访问权限，并允许个人查看和/或使用网站或网站所提供的内容，但无意进行任何更改或扩展，也不会更改或扩展其服务和访问权限。所有访问和使用权限，将受下列条款与条例约束：(i) 条款与条例；(ii) 风险提示；以及(iii) 完整免责声明。请注意，网站所提供的所有讯息，仅限一般资讯用途。此外，XM所有在线交易平台的内容并不构成，也不能被用于任何未经授权的金融市场交易邀约和/或邀请。金融市场交易对于您的投资资本含有重大风险。
所有在线交易平台所发布的资料，仅适用于教育/资讯类用途，不包含也不应被视为用于金融、投资税或交易相关咨询和建议，或是交易价格纪录，或是任何金融商品或非应邀途径的金融相关优惠的交易邀约或邀请。
本网站上由XM和第三方供应商所提供的所有内容，包括意见、新闻、研究、分析、价格、其他资讯和第三方网站链接，皆保持不变，并作为一般市场评论所提供，而非投资性建议。所有在线交易平台所发布的资料，仅适用于教育/资讯类用途，不包含也不应被视为适用于金融、投资税或交易相关咨询和建议，或是交易价格纪录，或是任何金融商品或非应邀途径的金融相关优惠的交易邀约或邀请。请确保您已阅读并完全理解，XM非独立投资研究提示和风险提示相关资讯，更多详情请点击 这里。
